3D Movies: The Good, The Bad, The Future?
With a recent surge in the number of 3D movies being released, it seems that 3D is certainly enjoying the spotlight. The last year alone has seen the release of My Bloody Valentine, Bolt, Coraline, G-Force, Monsters vs Aliens, The Final Destination and Up, and that is by no means a definitive list. This begs the question of why now, and is the rise of 3D movies worth talking about? In order to obtain more insight into this matter, we need to think about the good, the bad, and the future of cinema.
The Good
Perhaps the biggest advantage 3D movies have right now is that they are still a novelty. Yes, this year has seen an influx of them, but they do have a long way to go before they outnumber 2D movies. For now, 3D movies do seem to be high on studio’s agendas, and they are being used to breathe new life into otherwise forgotten or badly reviewed movie franchises. Only time will tell as to how successful this will be.
Another string to the 3D bow is that there is the potential to take audiences into the reality on the screen. I recently watched a 3D horror movie and people were jumping in their seats and grabbing in the air. There was a fun, social energy in the auditorium; one that I have never experienced with a 2D movie. 3D undoubtedly makes what we are seeing more vivid and dare I say it, real. We can almost touch the world the characters exist in, and there have been a few rare moments where I felt like I was at the same table as the characters I was watching. But ‘rare’ is the key word here; it isn’t always that easy to blur the boundary between our worlds and the worlds on the cinema screen, which leads nicely onto the downside of 3D movies.
The Bad
Some movie-goers have experienced motion sickness during a 3D movie. It is yet to be determined if it’s the 3D itself or the glasses. Either way, there has been a strong correlation between 3D movies and headaches and sickness. The glasses are another argument against 3D movies. Some may have no qualms, but for others, they can be uncomfortable and distracting. Thankfully, we have moved away from the days of cardboard glasses, and cinemas now offer plastic specs at an extra cost.
Another negative aspect is style over substance. A 3D movie might well break all box office records but it could be awful in terms of narrative, character development and emotional impact. The Final Destination was a recent example of this. The story was ridiculous, the acting less than impressive, and the characters forgettable, yet it managed to find an audience and was by no means a disaster.
Currently, 3D is an exciting experience on the big screens, but what about when we watch these movies at home? I recently watched Journey to the Center of the Earth in 3D at home and it didn’t quite work; not for me anyhow. My TV is of average size, and the 3D effects simply did not translate well. At this moment in technological time, 3D movies provide little to no dimensional impact on the small screen, and that isn’t the only area where they fail to transcend.
Lastly, modern 3D genres are limiting. The majority of 2009’s 3D releases fall into the category of animation, placed alongside a few horror movies thrown in for cheap thrills. When will we see a stunning 3D movie from another genre?
The Future
In a recent issue of Empire Magazine, Peter Jackson was reported saying that he wants to make 3D versions of the Lord of the Rings Trilogy, but the Warner Bros. says there aren’t enough 3D screens to justify this. Jackson also has 3D visions to release a remake of the classic 1954 film, The Dam Busters. With a budget of £24 million, this will certainly be on everyone’s watchlist. There is still a long way to go before 3D can really dominate and as it currently stands, such movies can only be shown in selected cinemas. James Cameron’s action/adventure/sci-fi movie Avatar is imminent, and if we believe the hype and the articles to date, it may change the face of cinema forever according to CNN. It is also reported that 2010 will see the release of a 3D television, and we are also promised 3D versions of Toy Story and a tie-in 3D computer game. Regardless of all the arguments against it, 3D looks to have a big future ahead of it.
Further Reading
- 3-D Film at Wikipedia
- The Illustrated 3D Movie List
- AMC’s Top Ten 3D Movies
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79d08/79d080de628ac10a20c369de659c0cafa35defc3" alt=""
Rob Mills is a Writer, Project Manager, and huge film fan. He has lent his skills to the BBC, Mark Boulton Design, Carsonified and now Huw David Design. When he isn’t in the cinema, he can be found writing for various websites and publications, including his blog. You can also follow Rob on .
I’ve been on both sides of this issue. I’ve hated the new 3D and I’ve loved it.
When the resurgence of 3D first came back, I ventured out to see “My Bloody Valentine 3D”. I was impressed with the technology, but it was a little nauseating (the 3D, not the content) and difficult to focus during camera moves. The edges were just too blurry when the camera was panning, and handheld was a joke. What I was most impressed with was the dimensionality of the images. Sure they had the occassional gimicky object popping through the screen, but overall, the benefit of this new technology was that images seemed more realistic through the separation of planar spaces.
Last week I went to see “Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs” in 3D. After watching this evolution from the reissue of “Nightmare Before Christmas,” “Beowulf,” “Up,” and “Monsters vs. Aliens,” it is clear that the technology has grown exponentially, as has the expertise of the people using it. The motion of “Cloudy” was clear. The focus was where it should be. There were no schlockey moments of things needlessly popping out of the screen to call attention to the technology. And after a while I became so adjusted to the image quality that the 3D technology became transparent and I found myself being caught up in the story. This is precisely the point of any new technology in an artistic field, to become a tool to better tell the story or convey a message. The technology is there to enhance the message, not to be the message.
But there still appear to be gimmicks on the horizon. Disney and ImageMovers “A Christmas Carol” coming out this christmas season seemed like a take-it-or-leave-it film when I saw the trailer in 2D. In 3D, however, it looks like a must-see film. What I gained from that impression is that, at least with this example, is that the film exists to service the technology and not the other way around.
While this is a little disappointing, it is part of the evolution process. There have always been projects that experiment with the technology in order to help the technology evolve to a place where it becomes more of a tool and less of a gimmick. “Tron” was noted for its use of CG, and now CG is virtually invisible and being used to enhance the story as much as to tell it. Even sound was accused of being a gimmick with “The Jazz Singer,” as was color, and now we can’t imagine a film without them.
This evolution process indicates that in the near future we will see many poor films designed just so people can play with and experiment on the new technology. But in the future, we will see 3D become so commonplace that a world of 2D film may go the way of the black-and-white silent film.
Great post! I am a sucker for the latest push in 3D, but greatly prefer the animations over the live work.
Great article Robert! It’ll be interesting to see if the 3D trend continues or if it fades again.
That being said, there have been a few movies that I felt would be “interesting” to watch in 3D, but I missed the time frame to watch them. Perhaps if I owned a larger TV & had HD access or a Bluray player or AppleTV I could test out the home 3D experience.
Thanks again for the article.
Hi !
Thank you for the article and all your site, I really like it and had a nice time reading everything :)
If you want you can check my site too (http://www.allfilmtrailers.com/) with updated articles about Films !!
Katzenberg was reported saying that he had a vision of people owning their own 3D glasses soon … with DreamWorks Animation’s decision to produce 3D movies from now on, I’d say that’s a good possibility.
I don’t think it is fair to blame 3D for the bad story and horrible premise behind the latest Final Destination. Have you seen any of the previous ones?
Thanks for all the comments guys. Glad you enjoyed the article.
3D is certainly at an interesting time and I for one am looking forward to seeing how it evolves over the coming years.
Eric – I too saw Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs last week and I agree with your comment. It does show improvements in the technology and it is one of the better 3D films I have seen in terms of colour, visuals and presentation.
Greg – Yeah I think that my experience of 3D films at home was affected by my small and rather old TV set! Perhaps if I upgraded my technology at home I would have enjoyed the 3D film more? Or maybe it is only suited to the big screen at the moment. I’m undecided.
Jamie – I wasn’t blaming the 3D technology for the poor quality of The Final Destination. In fact I was trying to communicate that despite, in my opinion, the poor storyline and acting, I think the fact that it is in 3D is the reason why it found an audience and performed well at the box office. It was style over substance.
I must go now, I am off to see Toy Story in 3D! I wonder how it will compare to the original 2D version? Perhaps I’ll post here with my thoughts :)
Rob.
I blame bad taste for any success Final Destination had.
I saw Christmas Carol,what a fantastic film & was so excited to see it in 3D until just about over half way through I felt sick ,eyes hurting & headache coming. I had those symptoms for 24hrs & didn’t eat in that time.
I’m really upset because I would like to go & see it again & Avatar looks amazing , but don’t want to risk feeling like that again. I hope you have a choice of format when it comes out on DVD.
I can’t wait for the new toy story 3 movie… do you guys know when it’s realeased ?
Good comments about 3D media- there seem to be many mixed feelings about the topic with the TV product released by various manufacturing companies, it seems that it’ll be no time befvore its in our homes. but one question? do ya think there will be enough content……
I am currently completeing a MA motion graphics -dissertation on the subject of motion graphics for 3D broadcasting- the pros and cons. research concluded so far shows that within the past 6 months or so, 3D development has progressed rapidly and i predict that 2012 will see a more powerful immersive experience.
any comments? more than welcome.
I was sick after Avatar saw it the Sunday and on Monday I was really sick had to get meds to make me feel better what percentage of people have this problem I don’t suffer from motionsickness at all, nor do I have problems with my eyes don’t even have glasses.